🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear talks with Washington provided that it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated solely negotiations produced results, and shared fresh requests had originated from intermediaries to resume negotiations with the US government. He claimed Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Challenging Course

The foreign minister is treading a complex path since Iran wishes not to appear to be acting from a stance of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more resilient defensively and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Previous Negotiations Suddenly Terminated

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that ended with the US president asserting the locations had been destroyed. Following this, Western states exercised their right to reimpose international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iranian officials said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could work within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with the US representative the American negotiator only for the agreement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Position

Iran's diplomats declared the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be revived in some form if talks reopen.

The American leader last week stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to restart talks, but privately Iran's diplomats state they are not yet receiving coherent offers from the United States either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of non-responsiveness in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a show.

Political Standpoint

In his remarks to the conference, intended to depict the US as a dominant force that exploits the concept of global regulations, Araghchi said the two-week conflict showed the clash could not be resolved by armed force. He asserted the strikes began with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and ended with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were executed with full US knowledge and coordination, making faith difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Primary Answer

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had always sought to dictate their demands during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be active and stays the final resolution to settle disagreements, but its requirements, guidelines and fundamentals must be respected."

"If they speak to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and respect, they will receive a answer in the same tone."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the struggle of restoration and recovery, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We learned many lessons from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He stated: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, stays intact. The facilities and equipment, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the determination of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have developed more powerful, more integrated, and more backing of the government and the nation in the aftermath of this attack."