🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has stated to have scraped millions of tracks from the popular streaming service and is preparing to release them online.

Potential Impetus for AI Development

Industry experts noted the seeming leak could boost AI companies looking for material to develop their models.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive reported it had obtained 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million entries of metadata such as performer and album names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not represent its full inventory.

“We have identified and disabled the nefarious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” stated a company representative.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an investigation into unauthorized access found a external actor collected public metadata and used illicit tactics to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Declared Mission and Worries

Spotify does not think the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a method of exchanging large data files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

AI Training and Copyright Debate

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ rights, said the leaked music would likely be used for training AI models.

“Educating models on illegally sourced data is unfortunately common in the AI industry, so this stolen music is highly likely to end up training AI models,” he said.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a huge online archive of copyrighted books that has reportedly been leveraged by Meta to develop its AI models.

A founder of an AI startup wrote on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in theory “build their own personal free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive said it could also allow tech companies to “train on modern music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has become a key issue between artists, authors and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Proposals and Reactions

In the UK, artists and writers have protested against a government proposal to allow AI companies use protected work without permission unless the owner signals. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ concerns.

A government minister for science, research and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The administration has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.